Validating stories on the internet

Returning voted ballots from voters in hard to reach places (for example remote military outposts) in time to meet state election deadlines is difficult.

While the appeal of Internet voting is obvious, the risks, unfortunately, are not, at least to many decision makers.After security researchers reviewed the system and warned that it was not secure, the deputy secretary of defense cancelled the SERVE project because Do D “could not ensure the legitimacy of ballots” cast through the SERVE system.In response, congress amended the NDAA directive in 2005 and directed the U. Election Assistance Commission and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to study the online return of voted ballots for the purpose of setting security standards so the Department of Defense may use them for the creation of a secure online voting system for military voters.Federal Efforts to Secure Online Voting for the Military Researchers for the federal government have spent a decade and a half and over 100 million dollars to study online voting For this reason, the U. Election Assistance Commission did not set security standards or guidelines for an Internet voting pilot project to be carried out by the Department of Defense (Do D) for military and overseas voters.There are no federal security guidelines because the federal government concluded online voting cannot be done securely.

Search for validating stories on the internet:

validating stories on the internet-61

is not within our grasp led Congress to repeal that directive to the Department of Defense to pursue online voting for military and overseas voters in the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “validating stories on the internet”

  1. It not only asks you questions about your personality, likes, and dislikes (“Do you think women have an obligation to keep their legs shaved?